BTC $104432.4748
ETH $2514.4288
XRP $2.1677
BNB $656.0892
SOL $154.8015
DOGE $0.1903
ADA $0.6784
TRX $0.2673
stETH $2512.5315
WBTC $104300.2239
SUI $3.2659
HYPE $32.5690
wstETH $3028.1655
LINK $13.8469
USDS $1.0002
AVAX $20.6952
XLM $0.2657
BCH $409.1874
LEO $8.6737
TON $3.1602
HBAR $0.1673
WETH $2514.3924
LTC $87.0767
weETH $2686.8235
DOT $4.0678
XMR $324.3561
BSC-USD $1.0004
BGB $4.6984
BTCB $104563.6042
WBT $31.1442
USDE $1.0010
PEPE $0.0000
PI $0.6449
TAO $430.4742
AAVE $241.2370
UNI $5.9718
DAI $0.9993
sUSDe $1.1750
CRO $0.1029
OKB $50.1016
APT $4.7284
NEAR $2.4140
CBBTC $104434.2564
ICP $4.8984
ONDO $0.8252
ETC $16.8778
GT $19.3793
BTC $104432.4748
ETH $2514.4288
XRP $2.1677
BNB $656.0892
SOL $154.8015
DOGE $0.1903
ADA $0.6784
TRX $0.2673
stETH $2512.5315
WBTC $104300.2239
SUI $3.2659
HYPE $32.5690
wstETH $3028.1655
LINK $13.8469
USDS $1.0002
AVAX $20.6952
XLM $0.2657
BCH $409.1874
LEO $8.6737
TON $3.1602
HBAR $0.1673
WETH $2514.3924
LTC $87.0767
weETH $2686.8235
DOT $4.0678
XMR $324.3561
BSC-USD $1.0004
BGB $4.6984
BTCB $104563.6042
WBT $31.1442
USDE $1.0010
PEPE $0.0000
PI $0.6449
TAO $430.4742
AAVE $241.2370
UNI $5.9718
DAI $0.9993
sUSDe $1.1750
CRO $0.1029
OKB $50.1016
APT $4.7284
NEAR $2.4140
CBBTC $104434.2564
ICP $4.8984
ONDO $0.8252
ETC $16.8778
GT $19.3793
  • Catalog
  • Blog
  • Tor Relay
  • Jabber
  • One-Time notes
  • Temp Email
  • What is TOR?
  • We are in tor
  • The Largest Crypto Heist in History: Bybit's $1.46 Billion Hack and Lazarus' New Laundering Tactics

    Introduction

    The cryptocurrency world was shaken when blockchain analysts uncovered a staggering theft of $1.46 billion from the Bybit exchange. The attack, attributed to the North Korean-linked hacking group Lazarus, has become the largest cryptocurrency heist in history, surpassing even the infamous DAO hack of 2016. Beyond the sheer scale of the theft, what makes this incident even more concerning is the innovative method used by the hackers to launder their stolen assets. By leveraging memecoins and decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, Lazarus has found a new way to obscure its financial tracks.

    The Bybit Hack: What Happened?

    On February 21, 2025, blockchain detective ZachXBT raised the alarm after detecting suspicious transactions exceeding $1.46 billion in mETH and stETH being siphoned from Bybit. These assets were quickly converted into Ethereum (ETH) via decentralized exchanges, effectively cutting off any hope of reversal. The method of attack was highly sophisticated: hackers manipulated the smart contract governing Bybit’s cold wallet, gaining unauthorized access and redirecting funds to unknown addresses.

    Bybit's CEO, Ben Zhou, later confirmed that the hackers exploited a vulnerability in the cold wallet signing interface, allowing them to modify the contract logic. This gave them complete control over the funds, yet the exchange assured users that their remaining assets were secure. Nevertheless, panic ensued as traders withdrew a record $2.39 billion within 24 hours, causing significant disruption in the market.

    Lazarus Group’s Role in the Attack

    Lazarus, a state-sponsored cybercriminal organization from North Korea, has a long history of targeting financial institutions and cryptocurrency platforms. Previous attacks, such as the Ronin Bridge exploit in 2022 and the Atomic Wallet breach in 2023, have been linked to the group. The evidence against Lazarus in the Bybit heist is compelling:

    • Blockchain Forensics: Investigators traced the movement of funds through multiple wallets, linking them to previous Lazarus-affiliated addresses.
    • Transaction Patterns: Analysts observed laundering techniques similar to those used in past Lazarus operations, including rapid asset conversions and cross-chain transfers.
    • Memecoin Laundering: The most novel aspect of this heist was the use of memecoins to mix stolen funds with legitimate market liquidity.

    Memecoins as a Laundering Mechanism

    Lazarus has innovated a new laundering method by exploiting the Pump.fun platform on the Solana blockchain. The group transferred 50 SOL (approximately $8,000) to a wallet associated with a newly launched token called QinShihuang. Within hours, the token's market capitalization skyrocketed to $3 million, with a daily trading volume exceeding $44 million.

    How the Laundering Process Works:

    1. Creating a Memecoin Hype – The hackers launched a new token, leveraging social media and influencer marketing to generate speculation and attract investors.
    2. Blending Stolen Funds – They injected stolen crypto assets into the liquidity pools of Pump.fun, mixing them with legitimate trades.
    3. Dumping the Tokens – Once liquidity reached a sufficient level, the hackers sold off large amounts of the token, cashing out in stable assets like USDT or ETH.
    4. Fragmenting and Bridging Funds – The proceeds were then fragmented across multiple wallets and moved across different blockchains via cross-chain bridges, further obscuring their origin.

    Blockchain researcher ZachXBT has since identified over 920 wallets connected to these laundering activities. Some of these funds have already made their way to centralized exchanges and crypto mixing services, making recovery efforts increasingly difficult.

    Regulatory and Security Implications

    The Bybit hack and subsequent laundering operation highlight growing concerns over the security of cryptocurrency platforms. Key takeaways from this incident include:

    • The Vulnerability of Smart Contracts: While DeFi platforms offer financial freedom and innovation, their reliance on smart contracts creates new attack vectors. Traditional multi-signature wallets may no longer be sufficient to protect large-scale assets.
    • The Rise of Memecoins as Criminal Tools: Previously dismissed as joke investments, memecoins are now being weaponized by cybercriminals for money laundering.
    • The Need for Enhanced Regulatory Oversight: Governments and crypto exchanges must implement stricter anti-money laundering (AML) measures, including real-time transaction monitoring and AI-driven anomaly detection.
    • The Potential for a Crypto Fork: Some experts, including Coinbase’s Connor Grogan, suggest that a blockchain rollback or hard fork could be considered to mitigate the damage. However, this remains highly controversial within the crypto community.

    Conclusion

    The Bybit hack and subsequent laundering operation represent a watershed moment in the ongoing battle between cybercriminals and the crypto industry. Lazarus has once again demonstrated its ability to adapt, leveraging new technologies and strategies to evade detection. However, the increasing scrutiny from law enforcement and blockchain analysts suggests that these methods may not remain viable for long.

    As the industry evolves, so too must its security measures. Exchanges, traders, and regulators must work together to enhance transparency and prevent future exploits. The Bybit attack serves as a stark reminder that in the digital age, no financial system is truly invulnerable.

    Hacktivism in the Service of Intelligence: The New Age of Cyber Warfare
    The Silent Threat: Over 300 Malicious Apps on Google Play Exposed

    Comments 0

    Add comment